![]() It's calling for a lot of action that's not likely to receive a response." Government agencies face strict oversight of their use of AI "What's missing is an enforcement and implementation mechanism. "The new executive order strikes the right tone by recognizing both the promise and perils of AI," Kreps said. ![]() Still, the executive order risks presenting an ambitious vision for the future of AI but insufficient power to bring about the industry-wide shift, Sarah Kreps, professor of government and director of the Tech Policy Institute at Cornell University, said in a statement. To bolster the push for watermarks, meanwhile, the White House will require federal agencies to use the markers when deploying AI products. The federal government will use its leverage as a key funder of scientific research to advocate for compliance on the warning around biological material, the White House said. The batch of reforms amounts to "the strongest set of actions any government in the world has ever taken on AI safety, security, and trust," White House deputy chief of staff Bruce Reed said in a statement. The executive order exerts oversight over safety tests that companies use to evaluate conversation bots such as ChatGPT and introduces industry standards like watermarks for identifying AI-fueled products, among other regulations. The Biden administration also calls on Congress to pass data privacy legislation, an achievement that has eluded lawmakers for years despite multiple attempts. The move stakes out a role for the federal government in a nearly half-trillion-dollar industry at the center of fierce competition between some of the nation's largest companies, including Google and Amazon. They allow a president to signal that they are doing something - that they are delivering on the promises they made when they ran for office, even if the executive action is really just the first step in a long process of change.President Joe Biden issued a wide-ranging executive order on Monday that aims to safeguard against threats posed by artificial intelligence, ensuring that bad actors do not use the technology to develop devastating weapons or mount supercharged cyberattacks. This gets at another purpose of executive orders: They can be the equivalent of very formally written press releases. "Although they are in very controversial topics in some cases, you're not seeing anything in there that's substantively all that dramatic." "If you look at the orders, the language of the orders and what they're actually calling for by the agencies seem to be very measured," Cooper said. The Biden orders may not be as far-reaching as advocates would like, but they may be more durable. This is a contrast with the early days of both the Clinton and Trump presidencies, where there were drafting problems and legal overreach that opened them up to challenges and forced revisions. All of that is the perfect storm to get a flurry of executive orders that we've seen," said Sharece Thrower, an associate professor of political science at Vanderbilt University.Ĭooper says more than any administration in modern history, Biden's team came in prepared, with the legal groundwork already carefully laid. This fits with another trend in presidential directives: There are a lot of them in times of crisis or war.Ĭombine a public health crisis with the first year of a presidency and "the fact that he is coming after a president that he opposes. Several other Biden executive actions relate to the coronavirus pandemic. 23, 1969, creating his new Urban Affairs Council. President Nixon signed an executive order on Jan. ![]() In fact, many of Biden's actions take aim at things former President Donald Trump had done with a swipe of his Sharpie. And as a result they can be, and often are, reversed by the next president. They direct the executive branch to do what is already in its power. "There's a lot of reviewing, reporting, sort of an urging to rev up that process, but it's not a substitute for the process itself."Įxecutive actions can't create new laws - they have to exist within the constraints of the Constitution and existing statute. ![]() "A lot of what these orders consist of are plans to make plans, in a sense," Rudalevige said. They call for the creation of task forces, direct agencies to begin a regulatory process or explore a policy change. and two letters (rejoining the World Health Organization and Paris climate agreement)Īnd while the numbers are large, these actions aren't barrier-breaking.four substantive proclamations (plus one ceremonial).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |